🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.