🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously went for the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.